Fire with Fire, or Fairness by Design
California’s temporary plan answers Texas gerrymanders, but Michigan’s model shows the path to lasting reform.
Gerrymandering has always been a way to tilt the playing field — but today it’s become a weapon powerful enough to decide who controls Congress for a decade. Now, the fight over who draws the lines is escalating.
In California, Governor Gavin Newsom is advancing a “fight fire with fire” plan: if Texas redraws its maps mid-decade to lock in Republican advantage, California will suspend its independent citizens’ commission and do the same. It’s temporary, and it comes with an automatic sunset after 2030. But it signals a new phase of the arms race.
Meanwhile, Michigan shows there’s another way. In 2018, voters created a citizen-led independent commission that has already produced some of the fairest maps in the country. Instead of escalating, Michigan rebalanced the system itself — proving that fairness can be built into the rules from the start.
This is the crossroads: escalation or reform, fire with fire or fairness by design.
The Fire With Fire Approach
Governor Newsom’s Election Rigging Response Act is framed as a defensive countermeasure.
It applies only to three election cycles (2026, 2028, 2030).
After the 2030 census, California’s independent commission automatically regains control.
It’s conditional — triggered only if Texas or another GOP-led state enacts a mid-decade partisan map.
Newsom’s logic is blunt: if they rig the game, we can’t afford to unilaterally disarm.
Michigan’s Different Path
In contrast, Michigan voters chose to lock in fairness by design. In 2018, they passed a constitutional amendment creating the Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (MICRC).
13 ordinary citizens serve: 4 Democrats, 4 Republicans, 5 independents.
Politicians, lobbyists, and staff are barred.
Meetings are public, maps are posted, and voters can comment.
The result? In 2022, Michigan’s new maps were widely hailed as among the fairest in the nation. For the first time in decades, districts weren’t stacked to entrench one party. Power shifted to reflect actual voter preferences.
Michigan shows what it looks like when fairness is built into the system instead of bargained over in crisis.
The Quiet National Movement
Newsom has also voiced support for something bigger: a national independent redistricting model.
He isn’t the first to suggest it — reform groups have been calling for this for years — but his public support matters. If governors from large states put their weight behind the cause, it raises the profile of a movement that’s been mostly ignored in the headlines.
Already, several states have commissions of their own:
California – Citizens’ commission since 2010.
Michigan – Citizens’ commission since 2018.
Colorado – Bipartisan commissions for state and congressional lines.
Arizona – Independent commission since 2000.
New York (hybrid) – An independent body drafts maps, though the legislature can override.
These states prove the model works. What’s missing is a federal framework that makes it the rule, not the exception.
Two Futures
Right now, America stands between two paths:
Escalation: If states like Texas and California keep “fighting fire with fire,” redistricting becomes an arms race, and voters are the casualties.
Reform: If the Michigan model spreads — and if national leaders push for independent commissions across the board — maps could reflect communities instead of partisan survival.
Closing Thoughts
California’s move may be tactical, but it risks normalizing the very behavior it’s meant to counter. If every state answers gerrymandering with gerrymandering, the result is an arms race where voters always lose.
Michigan shows there’s a better path: citizens, transparency, and rules that take politicians out of the map room altogether. That model, now echoed in a handful of other states, could be scaled nationally — if leaders and voters demand it.
The choice before us is stark:
Escalation, where each round of partisan maps invites retaliation, or
Reform, where fairness is built in by design.
We already know which one strengthens democracy. The only question is whether we have the will to make it the rule, not the exception.
References & Further Reading
If you found this post valuable, please consider sharing it with a friend. And if you’d like to support my work more directly, you can upgrade to a paid subscription — it means a lot to me and helps me keep digging into the issues that shape our democracy.
Yes! Logic dictates that Independent Citizens Commission in every State would have rendered Trump's move null and void! Republicans have won elections by not running on issues but by controlling the maps. This must end!
I agree with your writing, but for too long the ‘Far Right’ (MAGA) movement has gained strength improperly …especially now without regard to our ‘laws’ and ignoring ‘court orders’. We can no longer allow what they are doing to continue…. so what Gov. Gavin Newsome is doing is crucial to our Democracy. If Democrats can regain the majority in Congress, then working toward ‘Independent redistricting’ nationally should be a priority.